Factbox: ‘No quid professional quo’: Trump’s defenses within the impeachment investigation

Factbox: 'No quid pro quo': Trump's defenses in the impeachment investigation

WASHINGTON(Reuters) – U.S. President Donald Trump has maintained all through the impeachment inquiry that he did nothing improper in his dealings with Ukraine, at the same time as witnesses have detailed efforts by his White Home to get Ukraine to take actions that might assist him politically.

U.S. President Donald Trump speaks to reporters as he and first woman Melania Trump depart for journey to a NATO summit in London, from the White Home in Washington, U.S. December 2, 2019. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

Listed here are Trump’s positions on the primary features of the investigation:


Trump says he didn’t ask Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy to analyze Joe Biden, a number one contender for the Democratic nomination within the 2020 presidential election, for corruption. As an alternative, he mentioned, he had been urgent for a broad anti-corruption crackdown in Ukraine.

“Are we going to be sending large quantities of cash to a rustic they usually’re corrupt they usually steal the cash and that goes into everyone’s checking account?” Trump mentioned on “Fox and Associates” on Nov. 22.

However a tough transcript of a July 25 phone name exhibits that Trump requested the Ukrainian president to analyze whether or not Biden, whereas U.S. vice chairman, pressed Ukraine to fireside Ukraine’s prime prosecutor to cease a probe of Burisma, a fuel firm which Biden’s son Hunter had labored for as a director.

Biden and his son have denied any wrongdoing, and no proof has emerged to substantiate the allegations.

Trump additionally requested Zelenskiy to look right into a conspiracy concept that Ukraine, not Russia, interfered within the 2016 election and that an electronic mail server utilized by the Democratic Occasion is being hidden within the nation.

“I would love you to seek out out what occurred with this entire state of affairs with Ukraine,” he mentioned on the decision. “The server, they are saying Ukraine has it.”


Trump says he did nothing unsuitable in his dealings with Zelenskiy and factors to the impeachment inquiry testimony of Gordon Sondland, a Trump donor and U.S. ambassador to the European Union, who mentioned the president informed him in a telephone name on Sept. 9 that he wished no “quid professional quo” from Ukraine in return for the discharge of much-needed navy assist.

Sondland testified, nevertheless, that the White Home declined to ask Zelenskiy to satisfy with Trump in Washington with a purpose to stress the Ukrainian president to announce the investigations Trump wished.

Sondland mentioned that “everybody was within the loop” on the highest ranges of the Trump administration in regards to the stress marketing campaign.

Sondland mentioned he progressively got here to imagine that the White Home was holding again the $391 million in safety assist to stress Ukraine.

Trump’s performing chief of workers, Mick Mulvaney, acknowledged that White Home withheld the cash with a purpose to push Ukraine to analyze the 2016 election, though he later reversed these feedback.

Trump has acknowledged that he held up the navy assist, saying he wished to encourage the nation to sort out corruption in a broad sense. Transparency Worldwide, a non-governmental group, ranked Ukraine within the prime third of essentially the most corrupt international locations in a world index.

Trump didn’t tackle corruption in his July name with Zelenskiy and he didn’t convey it up the primary time the 2 males spoke shortly after Zelenskiy was elected in April, information from each calls present.

Trump finally launched the cash on Sept. 11, after information of the freeze turned public.

Reporting by Andy Sullivan; Modifying by Peter Cooney and Alistair Bell

Our Requirements:The Thomson Reuters Belief Ideas.



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here